37 pages • 1 hour read
Jean-Jacques RousseauA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) was one of the seminal figures of the Enlightenment, an intellectual movement in 17th- and 18th-century Europe that sought to organize social life around principles of reason and science. He is best known for his advocacy of radical democracy in works such as The Social Contract (1762), which opens with the famous line “man was born free, but is everywhere in chains.” Whereas other Enlightenment philosophers emphasized property rights or representation as the key to achieving political freedom, Rousseau insisted on citizens playing the most direct role possible in the management of their affairs. The Discourse on Inequality provides a philosophical justification for this position by showing how human beings thrive when they are self-sufficient and least subject to external restraints. Later in his life, Rousseau was invited to apply his ideas to the formation of a new Polish constitution, the first modern constitution in Europe.
Rousseau’s other literary works made him immensely famous, and infamous. In 1761, he published the novel Julie, a major contribution to the Romantic movement. Its celebration of emotion over social decorum was wildly popular with readers. His autobiographical Confessions scandalized readers with its descriptions of his sexual exploits and his abandoning five children. He also suffered persecution for his book Emile, which describes the ideal education of a fictional child, for suggesting that the teachings of the Catholic Church hinder a child’s intellectual and moral development. He fled his native Geneva (then an independent city-state) and traveled extensively throughout Europe before dying in France in 1778. Just over a decade later, the architects of the French Revolution would cite Rousseau as an inspiration, especially his support for democracy and his idea that politics should reflect the “general will” of the political community.
Hobbes (1588-1679) died more than 30 years before Rousseau was born, but his shadow loomed over European philosophy, and Rousseau’s work challenged Hobbes often, sometimes calling him out by name. The contrast between them is most evident when comparing Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality with Hobbes’s most famous work, Leviathan (1651), where both introduce a view of human beings in a state of nature. Hobbes’s state of nature is what he calls a “war of all against all” (xx), a condition of lawless violence where life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Since life would be so awful in nature, human beings have to live under strong governments capable of enforcing the laws and defending against external threats. Rousseau’s alternative view finds human beings relatively peaceful with no genuine need for government. On his view, they should submit only to a government that gives them the maximum amount of freedom consistent with the basic requirements of social order.
It is common to describe Hobbes as a pessimist and Rousseau as an optimist, but the context for their writings is significant. Hobbes wrote during a time of civil war in England, which culminated in the execution of King Charles I. The political chaos and immense suffering of his epoch led him to prize order and peace. The original cover of Leviathan shows the image of a king who is made up of a mass of individuals. He agreed with Rousseau that the people were the ultimate source of sovereign political power and that governments exist to protect their rights. Their debate over how governments can best protect those rights remains one of the most pressing questions in political philosophy.
Although Rousseau is better known as a rival of Hobbes, he was also a critic of John Locke, another English philosopher of the Enlightenment. Locke’s Second Treatise on Government had an enormous influence on the American Revolution, particularly the Declaration of Independence. It argues that human beings enjoy a right to “life, liberty, and property,” which Thomas Jefferson would revise into “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Likewise, Locke proposes that the violation of such rights by the government can in some cases trigger a “right of revolution,” nearly identical to the language Jefferson uses to justify independence from England.
Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality is in some respects more of a challenge to Locke than Hobbes. Locke’s state of nature is more similar to Rousseau’s than Hobbes’s, agreeing that the law of nature leads all people to be free, equal, and independent, with occasional conflict but nothing like the “war of all against all” envisioned by Hobbes. Likewise, Locke identifies the invention of private property as the decisive break between nature and the formation of civil society (for Hobbes, it is the formation of government). The main point of disagreement is that for Locke property is indispensable for freedom, so that human beings can reliably enjoy the product of their labors, and governments are necessary for protecting property rights against theft or deceit. Rousseau takes the opposite position that property marked the end of human freedom by establishing differences of wealth and power, which then allow human beings to make others dependent on them for their livelihoods.
By Jean-Jacques Rousseau