42 pages • 1 hour read
Sloane CrosleyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death by suicide and mental illness.
Crosley passes the restaurant where she last saw Russell frequently. She begins a ritual of sitting across the street from the restaurant at night, studying the table where they sat through the window and having imaginary conversations with Russell. She dreams of him most nights—she dreads them but also longs for them because in the dreams, she gets to have conversations with him about his death.
Crosley has not spoken to Russell’s partner since their meeting in Connecticut. She does not know what has become of Russell’s ashes or what his partner plans to do with them. She does not want to bother his partner, knowing that his grief is enormous.
As the end of September arrives, Crosley is mired in her grief. She believes that not focusing her thoughts on Russell at all times is a betrayal to him. When she notices that her pulse often seems to be racing, she visits a cardiologist, who says that Crosley is experiencing panic attacks.
Unexpectedly, Crosley receives an email about her stolen jewelry from an audience member from a book reading that she gave, during which she spoke of the theft. Taken with her story, the man searched for the items on eBay and found two of them for sale. His email includes links to the sale pages. Crosley, knowing that the tiger eye ring was repaired, is certain that this piece, along with the amulet necklace for sale by the same seller, is hers because she can see the evidence of its repairs. She sets about purchasing the ring with the aim that the seller’s return address will lead her to the thief’s identity.
Crosley joins a virtual grief support group. At times, she becomes disgusted at the way the group only feeds her need to wallow in her grief. She often thinks often about one of Russell’s favorite books—a biography of Edie Sedgwick, who also died by suicide. She speculates that Russell’s suicide has something to do with Sedgwick’s. She briefly recalls how much Russell—who grew up in a lower-middle class family in New England—loved Hollywood culture, but not for its wealth. Crosley explains that he admired those who were eccentric and lived outside of the norm. She notes that the day before he died, Russell hung a framed cover of the Sedgwick biography, which was gifted to him by a colleague. She wonders how he could perform such an act and then end his life.
After locating two of the stolen items on eBay, Crosley contacts one of the detectives. She has purchased the ring and is having it mailed to the office of a friend. The detective tells her that nothing can be done and that there is not probable cause to go after the eBay seller. Crosley gets no help after contacting eBay, who insists that there is no way to prove that the item is the same one as hers, nor that it is a stolen item.
Crosley returns to the subject of Russell’s death and reveals that the night before she and Russell met for dinner, Russell and his partner had a fight. The subject of the fight was Russell’s accumulation of a massive number of possessions and his partner’s desire for Russell to downsize. During dinner, Russell told Crosley that before he sped off in his car in anger, his partner said, “[W]hatever happens, […] don’t kill yourself” (78). Crosley dwells on how angry that makes her toward Russell’s partner, and she muses on grief—she knows that she must try to find a way to resolve her grief, and yet she keeps returning to the restaurant to imagine herself having conversations with Russell to pretend that she can change what happened. She notes that she has been given several self-help books on grief, and though she initially does not intend to, she reads them all. She notes how, though their authors clearly try to differentiate their respective books from the other grief self-help books, none of the books succeed in being unique. She feels, too, that none of the authors have yet “gotten over” their own grief.
The tiger eye ring arrives. The return address indicates the location of the seller’s home, and Crosley looks it up on the internet. She talks with friends, trying to convince someone to stake out the house with her or find a way to catch the seller in the act of selling stolen goods. She considers how she can purchase back the necklace, which is priced very high. The detective repeatedly insists that there is no way to prove that the item is stolen. After some time, the necklace listing disappears from eBay.
Crosley acknowledges that even though she knows that recovering the missing jewelry will not bring Russell back, there are times when it helps to think this way. She notes that ancient Egyptian, Native American, and Greek cultures shared similar beliefs that the deceased can either take objects with them to the afterlife or return to retrieve objects that they left behind on Earth.
Crosley reads a study on suicide by a poet and critic whose death happens to occur shortly after Russell’s. She emphasizes that in suicide, death becomes a choice, and she argues that no one has the right to take that choice away from the deceased. She contemplates the psychological associations of various methods of suicide and wonders if she would feel differently about Russell’s death had he chosen another method.
She becomes fixated on retrieving the amulet necklace. Though she knows it is illogical, Crosley feels that it is important to recover the necklace for Russell’s sake—she cannot explain why she feels this way. Exactly six months from the date of the theft, she locates the necklace for sale by a different seller. Crosley devises a plan and recruits a friend to help. The friend pretends to be interested in buying another expensive item on the seller’s page—a Rolex watch—but wants to inspect it. The seller finally agrees and provides the address of a Manhattan building.
The friend heads to the address but quickly calls Crosley to explain that the situation was “shady” (92)—it was a small room where a man and a woman guarded a safe. Crosley insists on going to the location herself. Once inside the building, she makes her way to the suite number, passing what appears to be an empty restaurant. About 10 men are in the room, and one immediately asks who sent Crosley there. Feeling as though she is in a movie, Crosley explains that she is certain they have her stolen necklace. She recounts the story of how the necklace was stolen, stressing that she is prepared to buy the necklace back. The man tells Crosley to call him Dimitri and then insists the necklace is not there. He instructs Crosley to return the next day.
Crosley returns, finding only Dimitri and a woman there. Dimitri gives her the necklace, accepting no money for it and saying that the theft “shouldn’t have happened” (100). Crosley feels like she is on the verge of tears, unable to make sense of what has happened.
In Part 2, Crosley departs from the traditional linear structure of the stages of grief by presenting “bargaining” before “anger.”
In keeping with the theme of Social Expectations Involving Death and Death by Suicide, Crosley attempts to work through her grief using traditional avenues. The grief support groups that she attends and the self-help books that she reads, however, provide relatively little help to her personally. Crosley feels that her relationship with Russell does not “warrant” the kind of grief of members who had closer relationships with people who died by suicide. Crosley feels like her grief and thoughts around Russell’s death are at odds with the “norms” for grief. Thus, she continues mourning Russell privately and solitarily by visiting the restaurant where they last saw one another and holding imaginary conversations with him. This solitary mourning allows Crosley to reclaim ownership over her grief, carving out a space that validates her emotions despite external perceptions. The restaurant becomes both a literal and symbolic space where Crosley confronts her loss while preserving her connection to Russell, blurring the boundaries between reality and memory and bargaining and anger.
Importantly, she does not shy away from thinking frequently about suicide. Crosley risks appearing morbid or inappropriate because thinking through the method that Russell chose for his death—along with his interest in famous individuals who also died by suicide—is an approach that Crosley hopes will offer an avenue into Russell’s way of thinking. She hopes that they will help her uncover some central truths about Russell’s emotional and mental state. Connecting Russell’s death to a larger, societal phenomena is one way that she attempts to make meaning of grief. This process of contextualizing Russell’s death through historical and cultural examples reflects a broader human tendency to seek patterns and narratives in the face of incomprehensible events. By situating Russell’s decision alongside those of iconic figures, Crosley highlights the paradox of understanding and accepting individual choices within a collective framework.
Importantly, a large part of Crosley’s psyche will not allow herself to work through the grief. She forces herself to constantly think of and be reminded of Russell, as though a failure to focus on him even briefly would signify that she has selfishly forgotten about him. This, like the act of bargaining for the return of his life itself, is not rooted in logic but in emotion, demonstrating a common pathway through grief. In this emotion, Crosley is unapologetic. She is also careful not to speculate about the details surrounding Russell’s relationship with his partner. Instead, she leaves open the possibility that problems within the relationship could have contributed to Russell’s decision to die by suicide but knows that, short of involving his partner directly in the memoir, there is no way for her to obtain an objective truth on this subject. This restraint underscores Crosley’s respect for the complexity of grief and the boundaries of her narrative authority. By refraining from definitive claims, Crosley allows space for ambiguity, which mirrors the unresolved and often unknowable aspects of death by suicide.
The central theme of Methods of Working Through Grief can be traced by Crosley retrieving her stolen jewelry. When it becomes evident that the police can offer little help, Crosley does not give up—instead, she becomes motivated to take on this task herself. The action of doing something is important—she cannot perform any physical action that will change Russell’s death, but this is not true of the jewelry, in the narrator’s view. Devoting extreme time and energy into the search for the missing items is not just a means of distracting herself from the sadness of Russell’s death but a kind of psychological attempt to right the imbalance of the world created by Russell’s absence. The search for the jewelry serves as a metaphorical stand-in for the broader human desire to fix or undo loss. By focusing on tangible goals, Crosley channels her grief into action, which allows her to temporarily sidestep the immaterial nature of emotional healing. Indeed, she goes to great lengths to retrieve the items, even willing to buy them back herself. In this way, the “bargaining” stage of grief involves the stolen jewelry.
The circumstances surrounding the amulet necklace are clearly dangerous to Crosley, but she is willing to risk her safety to symbolically right the wrong of Russell’s death. In obtaining the necklace once again, Crosley is engaging in the “bargaining” stage of grief. She is willing to trade her safety and her well-being for the necklace. When Dimitri gives her the necklace back rather than selling it to her, insisting that his possession of the necklace at all was a mistake, Crosley finds herself at a loss and unable to explain the events when they do not follow the trajectory she imagined. This unexpected resolution disrupts Crosley’s narrative of control and highlights the tension between her need to impose order on her grief and the chaotic, unpredictable nature of loss. Dimitri’s act of returning the necklace without explanation becomes a moment of grace, reminding Crosley that not all mysteries can be solved.
Art
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Friendship
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Past
View Collection