logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Black Hawk

Life of Black Hawk

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1833

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Pages 1-34Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Pages 1-18 Summary

Black Hawk was born in Sac Village in 1767 and is 67 when he dictates his story. The Sauk people originally lived around Montreal. His great-grandfather Na-nà-ma-kee had a dream he would meet with a white man who would be his father. Na-nà-ma-kee fasted for years until one day he and his people discovered the white man arrived. The white man told him he was the son of the King of France and that he also had dreamed of coming to meet a nation that would be his children. He gave a medal and other gifts to Na-nà-ma-kee. He then was placed above all civil chiefs in the tribe as the Great Spirit made him a “great and brave general” (10). He received the “medicine bag” that established him as a principal leader of the nation. Na-nà-ma-kee asked the two chiefs to maintain peace.

After the British dominated the French in Quebec, the Sauk and the Fox decided to form a treaty of alliance and friendship with them. After that, the Fox united with the Sauk tribe, and both were driven by “their enemies” first to Wisconsin and then to Rock River, Illinois.

As a young man, Black Hawk proved himself as a brave warrior, leading a war party against the Osage. His father died after being wounded in a battle with the Cherokees. Black Hawk inherited the “medicine bag,” and after mourning his father for a year, he continued fighting against the Osage and other neighboring tribes.

Black Hawk and his tribe visited the Spanish authorities who informed them that the Americans had gained power. The Sauk became concerned as they knew Americans did not treat the Indigenous people well. They were initially reassured in the first meeting with the American authorities who gave them provisions, but they still supported the British. Americans kept a Sauk as a prisoner for killing one of their men, and Black Hawk sent a party to ask for his release. Upon their return, the men informed Black Hawk they had agreed to cede land in Illinois and west of the Mississippi in exchange for their friend’s freedom. However, the Americans ultimately killed the Sauk man, and the party were drunk during the meeting. That was how Black Hawk and the Sauk nation learned about the Treaty of 1804.

Pages 19-34 Summary

Black Hawk realized the Sauk ceded their homeland to the United States for $1,000 a year. He notes the men could not represent the whole tribe and that the compensation was unfair. Black Hawk discovered the American army was building a fort, Fort Madison, close to the Sauk village. Black Hawk and other men went to investigate the fort and alarmed the soldiers.

A prophet explained to the Sauk that they should align with the neighboring tribes or the Americans would take their homeland, but the Sauk refused. Conflicts soon started. Several tribes prepared for war, and Black Hawk resolved to attack the fort. Black Hawk wanted to burn the fort down, and firing continued on both sides for a whole day; but his operation was unsuccessful.

Black Hawk learned about the war between the British and the Americans. Soon, British Colonel Dixon offered presents to the tribes to ensure their alliance. Black Hawk was ambivalent about whether to ally with the British or to remain neutral. However, he notes that he had not seen “one good trait in the character of the Americans” who never kept their promises while he trusted the British more (22). Black Hawk wonders why the Great Spirit ever sent the whites to their land as they only brought “poisonous liquors, disease and death” upon the Indigenous people (23).

A Sauk party that traveled to Washington informed Black Hawk that the president asked for the neutrality of the tribes during the war and promised provisions for the Sauk. The tribe was pleased and decided to not interfere in the war. They planted corn, and they started for Fort Madison to receive their goods. At the fort, the trader told them he had no orders to offer them provisions. The Sauk realize the Americans deceived them. Soon, the British visited them offering gifts. Black Hawk states that they were forced into the war. The Sauk joined the British, and Dixon assured Black Hawk that if the tribe succeeded in battle, they would preserve their land.

Black Hawk resented that Indigenous people killed non-combatants during the war. As the British were losing, a disappointed Black Hawk returned to his village and found that Ke-o-kuck became a war leader. Ke-o-kuck promised he would defend the tribe against American invasion. Black Hawk decided to remain with his family and not engage in warfare.

Pages 1-34 Analysis

Black Hawk refers to his male ancestors, his great-grandfather and his father, who were also war leaders, to emphasize his own status within the tribe. The Sauk highly honored brave warriors who would defend their nation against any enemies, and young men strived to prove their courage and bravery in war. The traditional “medicine bag” was “the soul of the nation” and confirmed the authority of the tribe’s war leader and a young man’s passage into manhood (11). A war leader like Black Hawk was responsible for the nation’s survival and preservation. Black Hawk’s description of his own achievements in battle and the inheritance of the medicine bag after the death of his father show that he viewed himself as a powerful Sauk leader.

The theme of Colonialism and Black Hawk’s Physical and Literary Resistance is immediately evident as Black Hawk describes the tribe’s early relations with white men. The Sauk established trading relations with the French and the British, but things changed as European forces were battling to gain authority. A pivotal moment in Black Hawk’s narration is the arrival of the Americans in the Sauk homeland. As Americans gradually gained power after the War of Independence and the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, they established control over the land and enforced their plans of expansion. The Sauk were concerned as they learned the Americans would try to seize their country. Black Hawk details the circumstances under which the Sauk signed the Treaty of St. Louis in 1804. Black Hawk considered the treaty as the source of the tribe’s struggles. Throughout the narrative he claims the treaty was invalid as it was signed by four Sauk men who had no authority to represent the whole tribe and were only sent by Black Hawk to request the release of a Sauk prisoner. Black Hawk’s account at this point highlights the misleading and often fraudulent means the United States used to attain Indigenous lands. According to the treaty, the Sauk ceded their homeland to the United States government for annual monetary compensation, which Black Hawk considered unjust. These accounts highlight The Loss of Traditional Life and the Preservation of Indigenous Identity. As the Sauk lost their land to the white settlers, they increasingly lost their culture as well. Black Hawk recounts this loss but also attempts to preserve the tribe’s identity simply by providing this account, adding the Sauk perspective to the historical record.

Black Hawk joined the British forces in the War of 1802 due to his distrust toward the Americans and due to thinking that it would best serve his nation’s interests. His central intention in all of his deeds and actions was to preserve the Sauk homeland. Black Hawk claims he had no intention of making war against the white people and was ambivalent about the decision to join the war. However, he considered the arrival of settlers and the building of forts in Sauk land threatening. Furthermore, Black Hawk trusted the British as the Americans “made fair promises but never fulfilled them” (22). Black Hawk saw the neighboring tribes fighting against the United Sates army and realized their intentions to invade their lands. Simultaneously, the failure of the American government to offer provisions to the Sauk defined Black Hawk’s decision to ally with the British. This account of the white settlers’ mindsets and promises begins to highlight Indigenous Versus White Values and Mindset. Black Hawk points out that the white settlers were not honest or fair with their negotiations, preying upon the Sauk’s trust and solid ethics. Later in the narrative he will detail this more closely as he compares Indigenous ethics with the ethics of the white settlers.

Black Hawk demonstrates his ethics as a war leader as he opposed violence on non-combatants and resented that, during the war, Indigenous people were killing prisoners of the British. The theme of Indigenous Versus White Values and Mindset emerges as Black Hawk comments on the politics of warfare. As the Sauk values compel the warriors to save their people while fighting against their enemies, the white people disregard the number of soldiers killed. The theme of Colonialism and Black Hawk’s Physical and Literary Resistance reemerges as the war caused conflict within the Sauk tribe. The Americans were winning the war and Ke-o-kuck, the Sauk leader, advocated that the tribe should side with them for protection. The narrative counters the stereotypical views of the Indigenous American mindset as a monolith and displays the opposing political views of Indigenous leaders. Black Hawk defied Ke-o-kuck and continued his politics of resistance. Cases of violence by white people against the Sauk reinforced Black Hawk’s determination to carry on. However, by the end of the War of 1812, Black Hawk wanted to remain in his homeland without further warfare.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text