logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Rebekah Taussig

Sitting Pretty: The View from My Ordinary Resilient Disabled Body

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Historical Context: Disability Rights and the Social Model of Disability

The disability rights movement began in the 1960s and drew on other rights movements, including the civil rights movement, women’s movement, and gay rights movement. People with disabilities in the US were not protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act and faced problems with accessible transportation, housing, buildings, telecommunications, and other areas of life—excluding them from having the same experiences as people without disabilities. A specialist in disability studies, Lennard Davis describes how his parents, who were deaf, could not talk on the phone, request sign language interpreters during appointments, drive, or go to church or the movies because of a lack of closed captioning and sign language interpretation:

Disabled people were treated like children—dependent, helpless, and unlike children, pitiable. Most disabled people were not allowed the dignities of work, a love life, friends, children, advanced education, and a profession. And worse than all of this, being a person with a disability was tantamount to being an invisible person. No one cared about your plight; society ignored you. You essentially did not exist (Davis, Lennard. Enabling Acts: The Hidden Story of How the Americans the Disabilities Act Gave the Largest US Minority Its Rights. Beacon Press, 2015).

Disability rights began with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, when World War II veterans with disabilities demanded rehabilitation services and vocational training from the government. Subsequent activism followed when parents advocated for children with disabilities, and disability rights advocates fought for legislation to prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities.

In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was instituted to protect the rights of people with disabilities. It prohibits discrimination against them in employment, public services, public transportation and accommodations, government services, and telecommunications. The ADA views a person with a disability as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that “substantially limits one or more major life activity,” including those who had an impairment in the past but no longer do and those seen by others as having a disability (“Guide to Disability Rights Laws.” ADA.gov). Rebekah Taussig briefly discusses the ADA in the context of her own life and work done by disability advocates. She notes the broad definition of disability in the ADA and how people are often unaware of the legislation’s existence.

Disability rights focus on addressing barriers to transportation, public places, health care, and employment, as well as discrimination and negative representation in media. Sociologist and bioethicist Tom Shakespeare notes that ableism lies with societal factors, especially one’s environment: “[B]arrier-free buildings and transport are important not just in themselves, but also because they enable people to access other public goods, such as education, health, and employment opportunities” (Shakespeare, Tom. Disability: The Basics. Routledge, 2018). The disability rights movement gradually moved from a medical model to a social model of disability, a concept originated by the UK’s Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. In 1976, the group published a pamphlet that defined this social model: “[I]t is society which disables physically impaired people. Disability is something imposed on top of our impairments, by the way we are unnecessarily isolated and excluded from full participation in society” (Shakespeare). This shifts the focus from “fixing” disabilities to societal issues, allowing people with disabilities to fight for rights rather than having to prove their personhood (Shakespeare). To reiterate, the social model focuses on the following:

the interaction between functional limitations or impairments and physical and social barriers to full participation create disabling environments. [It] distinguishes between disabilities and impairments. Disabilities are restrictions imposed by society. Impairments are the effects of any given condition. The solution...lies not in fixing the person, but in changing our society. Medical care, for example, should not focus on cures or treatments in order to rid our bodies of functional impairments. Instead, this care should focus on enhancing our daily function in society (“Medical and Social Models of Disability.” University of California, San Francisco Office of Developmental Primary Care).

Taussig emphasizes the social model throughout the book and her definition of ableism to focus on society’s idealized body. She also focuses on the range of physical impairments on the spectrum of disability.

Cultural Context: Disability and Ableism

People with disabilities are the largest minority in the US. They comprise about 20% of the US population and face ableism in all areas of society. Ableism consists of discrimination and negative attitudes toward people with disabilities, while providing advantage to people without disabilities. Taussig broadens the definition of ableism to “the process of favoring, fetishizing, and building the world around a mostly imagined, idealized body while discriminating against those bodies perceived to move, see, hear, process, operate, look, or need differently from that vision” (10). In comparison to this ideal body, any bodies with physical limitations are seen as outliers.

While much progress has been made with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), issues remain for people with disabilities, who continue to fight for access to transportation, public places, health care, and employment among other areas. Taussig considers these issues—particularly health care, employment, and housing—but also relationships, feminism, and media representation. She discusses disability with intersectionality in mind, as other identifiers such as race, gender, sexuality, and class all play a part.

Disability advocates often use person-first language and recommend the phrase “people with disabilities,” although those who view their Disability as an Identity sometimes prefer identity-first language like “disabled person.” It can also be reductionist to use a general term like “people with disabilities” when experiences in the group vary; meanwhile, some individuals resist inclusion because of the stigma associated with it (Shakespeare, Tom. Disability: The Basics. Routledge, 2018). The ADA National Network suggests asking a person what their preferred phrase is rather than making an assumption (“Guidelines for Writing About People with Disabilities.” ADA National Network). Taussig herself uses identity-first language, which reflects her view of Disability as an Identity.

In relation to this, disability does not have a clear boundary for who belongs and who does not: “Human perfection does not exist. Everyone is limited in some way, whether it’s a minor blemish or an allergy or something more serious” (Shakespeare). This reflects one of Taussig’s main arguments: that because everyone has a body subject to physical problems, Disability Impacts Everyone. Disabilities range from visual and hearing impairments, to learning disabilities, to mental health conditions, to chronic illnesses, to paralysis. This means ableism impacts a broad range of people, and Taussig argues it impacts everyone because the ideal body is an illusion.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text