78 pages • 2 hours read
Stuart GibbsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Adult characters in Spy School are largely useless or absent. This motif of useless or incompetent adult characters creates space for teens and pre-teens to think for themselves, take risks, and solve problems. In this novel, adults are not only unhelpful in solving the problem—they’ve created the problem and lack the intelligence or awareness to affect a solution.
Alexander Hale and the principal are two of the primary incompetent adults in the narrative. The principal is depicted as so incompetent that he cannot remember his own key code or password. This aligns with the principal’s confusion when he tries to punish Ben by sending him to the Box, having forgotten that Ben was already sleeping in the Box. Erica tells Ben, “Every time the CIA sent him out into the field, he got captured. He wasn’t a very good spy” (74). Early in the book, Alexander tries to seem helpful. He presents himself as a supportive and highly skilled spy, but he is self-serving and a fraud. Unlike his daughter, Alexander’s “recruitment” of Ben into a mole hunt is not intended to catch the mole, but rather to extract information from Ben that Alexander can take credit for. The contrast between Erica and Alexander explores the motif of incompetent adults, crafting Erica as highly skilled and ethical and her father as bumbling and dishonest.
The general incompetence of the adults places the burden of problem-solving and world-saving on the young characters, which advances the narrative and allows intense and dangerous situations to be handled by kids. The motif also serves as a critique of government bureaucracy, depicting government agents as disorganized, inept, self-serving, and dishonest. Within this context and combined with Murray’s critique of the United States government in the furnace room stand-off, the contrast between the kids and the adults highlights the idea that the task of saving and improving the world will fall to the younger generation.
Gibbs depicts the academy as cold, unwelcoming, rigid, and foreboding. Gibbs sets the novel in January and February, so the cold, snowy weather adds to the discomfort of the environment: “There were vast expanses of lawn that I assumed would be beautiful in spring, although they were currently buried under a foot of snow” (11). Ben describes the buildings as “ugly and gothic, trying to imitate the majesty of places like Oxford and Harvard but failing miserably. Though braced by flying buttresses and dotted with gargoyles, they were still gray and uninteresting” (12). When Ben makes it to his dorm room, he discovers that the walls are barely soundproof, and the ceilings are slanted enough to be uncomfortable. His room is furnished with sparse army fixtures and the bathroom looks as though mold permanently resides within the showers.
Ben does not maintain the modest comforts of the dormitory for long, though, as he is quickly moved to the Box. The Box, Ben explains, “had been designed as a holding cell” (69). The environment is so foreboding that it nearly makes Ben resolve to quit the academy entirely. The Box’s cold, concrete environment is mimicked in the subterranean levels, which Ben frequently describes as having “Cold War” aesthetics: “So far, everything I’d encountered in the academy had been cold and hard: industrial shades of gray and Cold War décor” (101). Very little at the academy is described as comfortable, and the few things that convey any sense of warmth or homeliness belong to the adults and are off-limits to the students. The description of the academy as a cold and uninviting establishes that Ben is not offered any comforts at the school—no environmental comforts, physical comforts, or emotional comforts. The school’s impersonal and gray setting adds to and reinforces the discomfort Ben feels on every level as he enters a new environment, discovers his shortcomings, and tries to stay safe in the face of a deliberately constructed threat to his life.
As the novel is set in the world of espionage, guns are ubiquitous. The ability to shoot is a basic expectation, and advanced marksmanship is highly valued. The novel complicates and undermines the valorizing of guns through Ben’s general discomfort, lack of skill, and hesitance to use guns against other people. In the first chapter, Ben suddenly realizes that Alexander Hale is likely armed. Instead of being excited by the presence of a firearm, however, Ben’s reaction is more cautious: “In that moment, the entire encounter with him—which had merely been strange and exciting so far—became slightly unsettling as well” (8). In Ben’s first encounter with Erica, she too references the dangers of carrying a gun when she provides him with a Taser as a weapon instead of something more deadly. Ben tries to improve his marksmanship, but throughout the novel he remains ill-equipped to use a gun in actual combat. He notes later in the novel that, “even though I’d been putting in a lot of time on the shooting range lately, I’d somehow managed to get less accurate. The head instructor […] had even suggested it was safer for me not to have a loaded weapon—although he had given me a realistic-looking toy gun so I could bluff my way out of trouble without shooting myself in the foot” (193).
While the other academy students are largely proficient with firearms, Ben never develops comparable skills. Though a few other characters acknowledge that Ben should probably not have a gun, none of them question the usefulness or value of the gun in general. Instead, Ben is just seen as inadequate in that department. One of the major themes of this novel is individuality as a strength. By making the hero of the novel a character who uses their individual critical thinking and innovative approaches to problem-solving, the novel critiques the reliance of the others on guns. Though Ben uses the gun as a tool, he does not use it as a direct weapon against other people. Murray shoots Ben in the arm without hesitation, but Ben uses the gun to dislodge the ice and snow on the roof instead. This is evidence of Ben honoring his strengths and abilities, even though they differ from those of the other students, and critiques the reliance on guns that many narratives contain. Ben’s confrontation with Murray is hallmarked by violence and aversion as he notices Murray’s actions. Ben’s creative problem solving triumphs, aided by Murray’s over-reliance on his firearm. The critique is subtle, but it is noteworthy that the novel avoids situations in which the traditional use of a gun as a weapon against another person successfully solves a problem.
By Stuart Gibbs
Action & Adventure
View Collection
Action & Adventure Reads (Middle Grade)
View Collection
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Childhood & Youth
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Daughters & Sons
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Fathers
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Friendship
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Juvenile Literature
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Realistic Fiction (Middle Grade)
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection