67 pages • 2 hours read
Ronald TakakiA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
In Strangers from a Different Shore Takaki explores competing visions of the US, examining how people have perceived and experienced the country across different nationalities and generations. In developing this theme Takaki reveals the sharp contrasts between first wave Asian immigrants’ initial expectations of the US and the reality of their lives there.
Takaki explains that first-wave Japanese immigrants imagined the US as a land of wealth where “money grew on trees” (45). Similarly, Chinese immigrants imagined the US as “Gam Saan,” or “Gold Mountain,” where they could find better jobs and easily become wealthy. As one Chinese poem said, “If you have a daughter, marry her quickly to a traveler to Gold Mountain / For when he gets off the boat, he will bring hundreds of pieces of silver” (231). Filipino immigrants, too, associated the US with prosperity and imagined that after a few years of working in the US, they would return “with cash rolls bulging in their pockets […] to pay off the mortgages on their lands and recover their family homes” (62). American labor contractors encouraged these romanticized images, since they wanted to entice these workers into signing contracts with American employers. They traveled through Asian towns showing movies about “glorious adventure” and “beautiful opportunities” in the US, persuading many Asians to immigrate (60).
However, Takaki explains that after years of toiling in low wage jobs in the US, many of these dreamers “found their dreams of wealth dashed in America” (115), changing their vision of a mountain of gold to their real “mountain of debt” (231). One Chinese immigrant and laundryman lamented: “Nobody can imagine such a life as ours in the ‘Golden Mountain’ [...]. I have been confined in this room for more than two years. Sometimes I feel so lonesome in this small jail, I just want to go back to China” (242). Despite their work ethic and determination, the US was often a disappointment to Asian immigrants due to the discrimination and exploitation they faced as they were excluded from broader American society. The author explains that instead of a land of opportunity, “Asian newcomers encountered a prevailing vision of America as essentially a place where European immigrants would establish a homogenous white society and where nonwhites would have to remain ‘strangers’” (472). This racialized definition of American identity became a challenge that generations of Asian Americans had to struggle against, and it also provided the impetus for Asian Americans across diverse national origins to come together in solidarity.
Takaki develops a theme explores conditions of labor and exploitation as he explains how first wave Asian immigrants were viciously exploited by labor contractors and employers. Takaki demonstrates how Asians from different countries and professional backgrounds became entangled in an exploitative dynamic, sometimes even before they reached the US. Working for American employers, such as plantation owners, American labor contractors traveled to Asia, where they used pamphlets to advertise a romanticized vision of the US as a land of abundance where “rich people” would “want the Chinaman to come and make him very welcome” (34). The author’s analysis shows that rich people did want Asian immigrants to come, but only because of the profits their cheap labor generated for their employers.
Indeed, with no workers’ rights guaranteed to them, and no minimum wage to demand, employers could pay Asian workers poverty wages that were lower than white Americans’ salaries. Takaki explains, “Employers developed a dual-wage system to pay Asian laborers less than white workers and pitted the groups against each other to depress wages for both” (13). This strategy of “ethnic antagonism” allowed bosses to reap huge profits from their workers’ grueling labor—all while tacitly encouraging white Americans to blame the Asians themselves for this labor market dysfunction. This toxic dynamic entrenched Asian immigrants in an impossible situation in which they had to accept whatever low wages employers offered while coping with anti-Asian racism from competing white workers.
Takaki’s exploration of labor and exploitation reveals the extent to which employers commodified and dehumanized their Asian employees, whether they laid railroad tracks, canned fish, or harvested crops. Among the worst of these work environments were the Hawaiian plantations of the 19th century, in which Asians were forced to labor until the end of their work contracts. William Hooper, an employee of a Honolulu mercantile firm, observed Chinese laborers working on a Hawaiian plantation in 1835, writing, “They have to work all the time—and no regard is paid to their complaints for food, etc., etc. Slavery is nothing compared to it” (21). Indeed, like enslaved people, Asian workers were commodified by their employers, who “viewed laborers as commodities necessary for the operation of the plantation” (24). One employer asked for “Japanese laborers” and “a Chinaman” on the same order as “bonemeal” and “macaroni” (24). Plantation life, according to one worker, was “much like a prison,” since they labored under the watchful eyes of abusive supervisors (140). Takaki’s exploration of labor and exploitation shows how Asian workers generated profits for their employers while toiling in dangerous and exploitative conditions, putting Asian labor strikes and civil rights movements into context.
Takaki’s consideration of labor and exploitation lays the groundwork for his analysis of the law as discriminatory weapon, as he shows how American authorities and employers used the law—or lack of it—to oppress Asian immigrants. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, Asians in the US had no legal recourse to deal with exploitative employers. Instead, they had to negotiate with them directly through complaints or strikes. With no legal protection, employers generally broke strikes easily, forcing Asian workers back into the same conditions or leaving them without work altogether. For instance, in 1866, 5,000 Chinese railroad workers struck, demanding better wages and working conditions from the Central Pacific Railway. Without legal protections, however, the strikers were vulnerable to their employer’s machinations, and when CPR bosses “isolated the strikers and cut off their food supply” they became “virtually imprisoned in their camps […] and forced into starvation” (86). They surrendered.
On Hawaii’s plantations, the authorities had even more power over Asian laborers. The contract-labor laws allowed employers to legally force contracted workers to work to the end of their three to five year contracts. If they ran away, the police could arrest and imprison them for the crime of “desertion.” In the early 1890s alone, thousands of workers were arrested for this crime (145). The police also enforced contract-labor laws during strikes. Acting as employers’ enforcement, they could legally “retaliate” and beat and arrest strikers and destroy their homes (148). Takaki blames the oppressive labor laws for emboldening employers and the police to behave in such a brutal manner, writing that “[p]lanters believed that their repression of strikes had been justifiable because contract laborers could not legally strike” (148).
Some Asian immigrants questioned the legal basis of this oppression. Chinese merchants lobbied for legal rights for Asians in America, citing the 1870 civil rights act which mandated that “all persons” in the US should have “full and equal benefit of all laws” (114). However, the equitable rhetoric in these laws was largely ignored by employers and authorities, and had “little or no effect on what happened in society,” leaving Asians “vulnerable” to exploitation and other abuses (114). Takaki presents the history of Asian American activism as an ongoing, decades-long effort to make the US apply its laws equitably and live up to its egalitarian ideals.
Asian American & Pacific Islander...
View Collection
Asian History
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Chinese Studies
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Immigrants & Refugees
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection