logo

43 pages 1 hour read

Keith Payne

The Broken Ladder: How Inequality Affects the Way We Think, Live, and Die

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Index of Terms

Poverty Line

The poverty line refers to the minimum income deemed necessary for a person or household to live on. Because the poverty line is largely determined by the cost of living, it is set on a national basis, but the United Nations has also set an international poverty line at $1.90 per day.

The poverty line has its root in the Orshansky index, which was developed by Mollie Orshansky, a researcher for the US Social Security Administration in the 1960s. Orshansky defined the index as the income needed to feed one’s family and cover basic expenses, and set it at three times the second-least expensive meal plan that would adequately feed an average family. Orshansky only intended the index to be used by other researchers, but when the Johnson administration declared its war on poverty, it used a version of the Orshansky index to determine who was eligible for government benefits. However, this more stringent poverty line was set at three times the cheapest possible way to feed a family.

The poverty line is important because it captures the relative nature of poverty and how the concept of poverty has shifted over time. While the formula has been adjusted for inflation, it has not been adjusted for changes in common expenses. In the 1960s, when the concept was developed, families spent about a third of their income on food, hence multiplying food costs by three to determine the poverty line. Today, however, families only spent about an eighth of their income on food, meaning that you would have to multiply food costs by eight to capture a true poverty line.

Relative Poverty and Absolute Poverty

The distinction between relative poverty (i.e., inequality) and absolute poverty is crucial to Payne’s arguments. Absolute poverty refers to those who live in material deprivation, while relative poverty refers to the difference between the richest and the poorest in a given environment. Although we tend to focus on absolute poverty, Payne’s main argument is that inequality matters more than poverty because determining who is rich and who is poor is more complicated than it seems. Most people living below the poverty line have modern conveniences such as televisions, cell phones, and refrigerators, which even the richest did not have in the past. However, poverty and wealth are always relative to what other people have in a particular time and place.

Status Ladder

The Status Ladder is a psychological concept used to gauge how people subjectively rank their social status. While you may expect the richest, the best educated, and those with the best jobs to place themselves high up on the ladder, studies show that there is a surprisingly small relationship between these traditional markers of status and how people rate their own status. This is significant because those who place themselves low on the ladder are more likely to suffer from the negative consequences of poverty and inequality, such as depression, anxiety, chronic pain, poor decision-making, and poor job performance, regardless of their actual income. In other words, the Status Ladder shows that feeling poor matters more than actually being poor. Payne uses this to highlight the importance of inequality. If we are living in an environment of high inequality, we are more likely to rank ourselves lower on the Status Ladder because we perceive those around us to have a much higher status than us.

Stress Response System

Our stress response system is the pathway through abstract concepts like inequality are translated into concrete health problems, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, and mental illness, which are caused by our bodies’ response to crisis. This crisis-response mechanism evolved to save us during short-term crises at the expense of long-term health. The stress response system releases large amounts of energy in response to perceived crises or opportunities by speeding up the heart and lungs, diverting water, and triggering inflammation. However, because it cannot create new energy, the stress response system diverts energy from elsewhere, shutting down other bodily functions. This is problematic because this system activates when we perceive threats, and the response can last for years. Because inequality causes us to perceive threats to our social status, its presence activates this stress response system, leading to long-term health problems like those listed above.

Veil of Ignorance

The veil of ignorance is a classic thought experiment outlined by philosopher John Rawls. Rawls was a sickly child—contracting maladies like diphtheria and pneumonia—but survived because he was born into a wealthy family (though his younger brothers contracted his illnesses and died). These events had a major impact on Rawls, and he became suspicious of the societally accepted notion that being born intelligent, disciplined, hardy, or wealthy was somehow praiseworthy because it was akin to winning the lottery. To determine how much inequality was too much, Rawls’s thought experiment asked subjects to imagine they were on a spaceship heading toward an alien planet. The subjects did not know anything about themselves, such as whether they were rich or poor, smart or dumb, or healthy or sickly, and they needed to determine which society on this planet they wanted to join. These societies ranged from extreme inequality on one end of the spectrum (i.e., a small ruling class with everyone else in slavery) to full egalitarianism on the other. Rawls concluded that any reasonable person would choose an egalitarian society because even the worst possible outcome would be tolerable there. He argued that if people were simply asked how much inequality they preferred, they would be biased by their own abilities and self-interest, but when placed behind this veil of ignorance, people can objectively see that egalitarian societies are preferable to unequal ones.

The significance of this thought experiment lies in how people consistently underestimate actual levels of inequality. Several studies have attempted to put Rawls’s thought experiment into practice, which Payne summarizes in the book. In these studies, respondents were asked to estimate how much wealth each quintile owned in reality and then to describe their ideal income distribution. In all cases, respondents described their ideal world as very egalitarian but not completely so. Similarly, when they described how they thought inequality looked in reality, everyone massively underestimated its scale.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text