66 pages • 2 hours read
Kirk Wallace JohnsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Prologue to The Feather Thief opens by describing the 2009 heist of the British Natural History Museum at Tring. Johnson retraces the steps of the thief Edwin Rist, who was a 20-year-old American student studying at the Royal Academy of Music in London. Rist, armed only with latex gloves, a flashlight, a wire cutter, a glass cutter, and a suitcase, committed the feather heist after a flute performance with the Royal Academy of Music.
The feather heist is quite remarkable given Rist is not a professional thief. Johnson describes how Rist walked for nearly an hour from the train station to the town of Tring. To access the museum, Rist had to navigate a narrow alleyway and cut through barbed wire and glass. His feather heist nearly failed when he dropped his glass cutter into a ravine. Nevertheless, Rist persevered in getting into the museum by breaking the glass window with a rock. Once in the museum, Rist rolled his suitcase to the museum’s ornithological (bird) collection, which is one of the largest collections in the world. Rist then stuffed his suitcase with 299 preserved tropical bird skins, many of which were collected by the mid-19th century naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace. Despite there being a guard on duty (who was distracted by a soccer game), Rist successfully pulled off the feather heist without being caught.
Johnson turns to how he first heard about this strange crime. He “was waist-high in the Red River” (5) of New Mexico where his fly-fishing guide, Spencer Seim, first told him about the feather heist. Johnson soon became obsessed with the mystery and wanted to solve it. His obsession led him to the feather underground.
Johnson focuses on Victorian era naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace. Wallace lived during the Victorian era’s “back-to-nature movement” (15). Like many other people of his era, Wallace was obsessed with collecting natural specimens. After reading Charles Darwin’s Voyage of the Beagle, Wallace decided to lead his own expeditions. He was especially interested in understanding the origin of species, hoping to write a book like Darwin.
Johnson recounts Wallace’s first major campaign to the Amazon, which ended in failure. Wallace initially traveled to the Amazon with another naturalist. The two men intended to collect specimens throughout the Amazon and ship specimens back to London during the expedition. The men hoped to use these specimens for research and to profit from their sales. After two years, the men parted due to competition with one another because they were collecting similar natural specimens.
Wallace focused his expedition around Rio Negro, which is the largest left tributary of the Amazon River. As originally planned, Wallace sent boxes of specimens downriver, thinking his intermediaries would then ship them to London. Instead, custom officials detained many of his boxes thinking they contained illegal items. Wallace paid the officials a large sum of money to liberate his specimens at the end of his four-year journey. He loaded nearly 10,000 specimens onto a single ship. Unfortunately, the ship caught fire while on the journey back to England, destroying all of Wallace’s collections. He was even unable to save his notebooks, which contained “years’ worth of research on the wildlife along the ink-black Rio Negro” (14).
Wallace did not spend long wallowing about his failed expedition. Aided by his memory and a few surviving drawings and notes, Wallace began giving presentations on his Amazon expedition findings to London’s scientific societies. By doing so, Wallace hoped to grow his reputation among these societies so that one of them would fund his next expedition. This plan proved successful. Wallace secured some funding for his next expedition to the Malay Archipelago.
In preparation for his journey, Wallace visited the British Museum of Natural History in London. He noticed that the museum had an incomplete collection of the Birds of Paradise, which represent “the strangest and most beautiful birds on the planet” (23). In fact, no naturalist had seen these birds in the wild. Wallace was determined to both broaden the museum’s collection as well as see them with his own eyes.
Wallace’s second expedition was far more successful than his first. While collecting specimens was taxing, Wallace also needed to protect them from insects and stray dogs. The sheer volume of specimens he collected over an eight-year period highlights his success in doing so. Wallace sent tens of thousands of natural specimens back to London, including “310 mammals, 100 reptiles, 7,500 shells, 13,100 moths and butterflies, 83,200 beetles, and 13,400 other insects” (33). He was most proud, however, of the 8,050 bird skins. The British Museum of Natural History purchased many of these specimens.
Wallace was also the first naturalist to see Birds of Paradise in the wild. He even witnessed the males elaborate mating ritual. Wallace’s goal turned to bringing some back alive to England. His initial attempts were unsuccessful. The birds died within a few days of being in his care. He bought two Birds of Paradise from a European merchant in Singapore. These birds survived the trip back to London, and Wallace gave them to the Zoological Gardens.
On this expedition, Wallace also came up with the theory of natural selection during a bout of malaria. He wrote Charles Darwin, father of evolutionary biology, a letter explaining his theory. Unbeknownst to Wallace, Darwin had been working on a similar theory for decades. While Wallace was still in the field, Darwin published his infamous book, On the Origin of Species. Although Wallace’s contributions to this theory are forgotten, Johnson underscores that he remains one of the greatest 19th-century naturalists.
In Chapter 2, Johnson describes the life of Lionel Walter Rothschild. Despite being born into a wealthy banking family, Walter had little interest in finance. Instead, he pursued his passion for collecting natural specimens. By 20 years old, Walter collected 46,000 specimens. For his 21st birthday, his father built him a museum, which would later become the British Natural History Museum at Tring. He opened the museum to the public in 1892: “The museum soon attracted thirty thousand visitors each year, a staggering figure for a small-town museum in those days but a sign of the voracious public appetite for the strange and exotic” (39).
While Walter had a keen eye for collecting specimens, he was terrible at accounting. He routinely overspent. His father even removed him from the family will in hopes it would curb his spending.
A British peeress, who Walter had an affair with, blackmailed him. Walter tried to hide the affair from his family by selling his bird specimens collection, which comprised 280,000 bird skins, to the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Prior to this sale, Walter’s obsession with collecting bird skins resulted in him having the greatest private collection ever collected by an individual person.
Johnson describes how women’s fashion resulted in the deaths of hundreds of millions of birds in the final three decades of the 19th century. Rare bird feathers became the ultimate status symbol. Johnson credits the French Queen Marie Antoinette with sparking this “feather fever” after she wore a diamond-encrusted Egret plume in her hair. Feather-filled fashion dominated magazines and shop windows. Hats were especially important to Victorian era women’s fashion. Different events and occasions called for different hats, “each demanding different species of bird for decoration” (44). Johnson describes how some hats included entire bird skins and were so large that women rode in carriages with their heads out the window.
The feather market employed tens of thousands of people by the beginning of the 20th century. The value of feathers also substantially increased as the number of birds in the wild decreased. As one example, a kilo of Egret feathers fetched over $12,000 in today’s dollars. Demand for birds outpaced supply. As a result, people set up feather farms. Conditions at these farms were inhumane. Some farmers blinded their birds to keep them more docile, as just one example.
Johnson ends this chapter by noting that most of the world at that time believed nature was an inexhaustible resource. Thus, they thought it was impossible to drive species to extinction or near-extinction. Unfortunately, they were wrong, and the plume trade decimated numerous bird species.
Johnson combines a classic true-crime narrative with discussions of his own investigation into the feather heist alongside the historical, cultural, and scientific context of humankind’s obsession with feathers. In the Prologue, Johnson details Edwin’s crime. While readers might find the crime initially bizarre, Johnson details humankind’s obsession with rare and beautiful bird feathers for museum and private collections, women’s fashion, and salmon fly ties since at least the Victorian era. Thus, readers come to see that the feathers Edwin stole are highly prized specimens.
Throughout this section, Johnson hints at the importance of biodata labels. These labels were tied around the bird specimens’ legs and contained critical information on where and when the bird was captured. Even Alfred Russel Wallace cared deeply about these tags:
He railed against the sloppy way in which other naturalists recorded geographical data: ‘In the various works on natural history and in our museums, we have generally but the vaguest statements of locality. S. America, Brazil, Guiana, Peru, are among the most common; and if we have ‘River Amazon’ or ‘Quito’ attached to a specimen…we have nothing to tell us whether the one came from the north or south of the Amazon’ (22).
Wallace was interested in understanding the origin of species. Without detailed geographical information, it would be impossible to know where a species lived and how and why it might have diverged from its ancestral species. The data attached to each specimen is unique. There will never be another specimen that contains similar data. Today, these biodata labels are still important. Scientists conduct research on the specimens only because they have such critical information. For this reason, museum curators protect these specimens and their biodata labels. Johnson provides this context to help readers understand in later parts of the book why Edwin’s removal of the biodata labels from the bird specimens is so problematic.
Johnson introduces two key claims in this section. The first is the Exploration of Obsession. Here, Johnson focuses on several avenues of obsession. He begins to hint at his own obsession with this crime, which resulted in a six-year investigation. During this investigation, Johnson travels around the world in hopes of finding the missing bird skins, better understanding Edwin’s motives and what happened during the feather heist, and whether justice for the missing bird skins could be found.
Another avenue is the Victorian era obsession with collecting natural specimens. The expeditions that Wallace and other naturalists led were dangerous. These naturalists faced attacks by wild animals, bouts of disease such as malaria, and even death all because they wanted to collect things that their compatriots did not have.
The final avenue is the feather fashion fever. Women during the Victorian era became obsessed with bird feathers, particularly those that were rare and beautiful. The desire for status was the key driver behind this obsession, which took a toll on wild bird populations. In some places, bird populations were decimated, with some even becoming extinct.
The second claim made in this section, which Johnson returns to throughout the book, is Humankind’s Destructive Instinct to Obtain and Preserve the Beauty of Nature. One poignant example of this is the fate of the Birds of Paradise. Wallace is obsessed with being the first naturalist to see these birds in the wild and bring some back alive to England, largely because of their unique plumage. Yet, he also feared for the fate of the birds:
‘It seems sad, that on the one hand such exquisite creatures should live out their lives and exhibit their charms only in these wild inhospitable regions…while on the other hand, should civilized man ever reach these distant lands…we may be sure that he will so disturb the nicely-balanced relations of organic and inorganic nature as to cause the disappearance, and finally the extinction, of these very beings whose wonderful structure and beauty he alone is fitted to appreciate and enjoy’ (30).
His fears sadly came true. Humans decimated the Birds of Paradise populations. Even today, some species remain endangered partly because humans wanted to preserve their beauty on hats, as part of fly-ties, and in museum and private collections.
Animals in Literature
View Collection
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Art
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
True Crime & Legal
View Collection