67 pages • 2 hours read
Dan JonesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Edward was wealthy with the spoils of war, and safely at peace with his diminished neighbors. He continued his program of lavish public events. He made popular legal and symbolic changes, creating a statutory limit on royal purveyances (wartime seizures) and changing the language of parliamentary legal proceedings from the Norman conquerors’ French to the native English, as vernacular English literature began flourishing. He gifted his sons important titles in different parts of his territories, giving them resources and responsibilities that did not compete but could form a coalition.
In the 1360s, two of Edward’s daughters, his wife, and his son, Lionel, died of sickness, Lionel having failed to Anglicize Ireland. The new French king stopped ransom payments to Edward and aimed to reassert French dominance. In 1367, Prince Edward (now governing Aquitaine) won an impressive victory at Najera, but the campaign brought bankruptcy and disease. Chronically sick, he returned to England. In 1370, an aging Edward and France were again at war.
In the early 1370s, military disasters depleted Edward’s continental territories. Pirates impacted trade. Economic stability and law and order deteriorated. Edward and Prince Edward were physically weak; John of Gaunt (Edward’s third son) tried to offer mediation as corruption and discontent abounded.
Previously, parliament facilitated negotiations between lords and king; in 1376, the Commons (knights and gentry) directed a list of reforms and redresses to John. A weakened Edward conceded. Concurrently, Prince Edward died.
Edward III died in 1377. His grandson Richard (Prince Edward’s son) was crowned, aged nine, in a ceremony centering his divine right. Fearful that Gaunt may have appropriate power if given a protectorate role, the political classes emphasized obedience to Richard, while his household and a council system governed. Problems required immediate attention, including French and Scottish aggression and subsequent financial pressure.
The Peasants’ Revolt (1381) was the first major popular uprising in England, provoked by poll taxes, labor legislation, and foreign fears. The rebels ransacked London, enacting both targeted and chaotic violence. They demanded an abolishment of political, social, and religious hierarchy, envisaging the king’s rule over and for the common people. Richard’s brave maneuvering was instrumental in ending the bloody chaos.
Richard’s marriage brought Germanic allegiances, favoring Rome, not France in the papal schism and brought costs instead of a dowry. Richard’s investment in an aesthetic culture of divine kingship was also expensive. France continued to dominate, taking territory and damaging trade; Richard’s military endeavors in Scotland were costly failures. His promotion of his close personal favorites alienated older magnates including his uncles. In 1386, after hostile negotiations in which Richard threatened to turn to France for aid, a parliament forcibly removed his governance for a year.
Two sides formed: a group of magnates (the Appellants) opposing Richard’s favorites and Richard (furious at the events of 1386) and his favorites. Both sides leveled accusations of treachery. Richard tried to raise troops; the sheriffs refused, arguing that the Commons sided with the magnates. The Appellants seized control. In a series of parliamentary trials in 1388, they purged Richard’s favorites and his household, executing anyone who had not fled.
In the 1390s, the political situation appeared to stabilize: Richard renegotiated his role and cooperated with his political community, and royal finances improved. He kept a magnificent court venerating divine kingship, which patronized an impressive artistic and literary scene. However, there were warning signs that the past haunted him: he did not trust the machinery of authority, quietly using retaining (like magnates did) to bind followers to him and ritually elevating his person without connecting to his people. Grieving the deaths of his wife and an exiled favorite, he lashed out publicly. He honored Edward II.
Richard achieved short-term military success in Ireland, but a peace agreement with France drew some criticism. Richard’s magnates vetoed a clause enabling French assistance against his subjects, to his fury. In 1397, Richard moved, arresting the senior Appellants of 1386. He oversaw a parliament full of his supporters, under military guard. He killed or exiled his old enemies. He redistributed wealth and power and announced the supremacy of his sovereignty.
Richard enacted absolutism in his favor under the guise of pursuing peace and extorting compliance. When Gaunt died in 1399, his massive Lancastrian bloc was due to his son Henry Bolingbroke, Richard’s cousin, recently banished on questionable charges. In his absence, Richard extended his banishment to life, annulled his inheritance, and distributed everything between himself and his supporters. He then left to subdue Ireland. In his absence, Bolingbroke invaded, attracting vast support. Though Richard returned and tried to raise support along with his allies, Bolingbroke rapidly seized control of England and announced himself Steward of England. Richard was captured and forced to surrender governance to him.
Before a gathering, not technically a parliament in the absence of the king, two archbishops read a statement of Richard’s agreement to renounce his Crown due to his inadequacy and asked if the people consented. The lords and the Commons indicated they did. In unprecedented proceedings, an assembly gathered to formalize his deposition through articles citing his failings. Bolingbroke presented his claim and was crowned. Richard, who had probably not consented, soon died in prison.
Though Henry’s coup met little resistance, it broke precedent. Rather than an undisputed heir stepping in, an alternative claimant seized the throne, offering fuel for the subsequent Wars of the Roses. Richard’s deposition marked the end of a dynasty: the 246 years of Plantagenet rule in England produced huge structural, cultural, and geopolitical changes to kingship and the region.
In this section, Jones uses the dramatic events of Richard II’s reign to build a narrative climax.
He highlights The Role of the Personal in History in setting the scene for Richard’s rule, showing the political significance of the fates of individual people. Towards the end of Edward’s reign, the new French king renewed hostilities and stopped paying his predecessor’s ransom, creating a challenging environment. The deaths of Edward’s children reduced the power bloc his dynasty represented, and Prince Edward’s death, in particular, changed the course of history: he was trained and prepared for kingship, whereas Richard II ascended the throne as a child. Jones creates a character portrait of Richard, suggesting he internalized the idea of divine kingship but also the traumatic violence and threat of his early reign. Jones suggests that Richard’s obsession with Edward II reveals that his mindset was focused on his personal experience over the structure of his position: he sympathized with the individual man over the realm.
Through Richard, Jones also explores the limitations in The Relationship Between Religion and Politics. By this point, and with the deliberate actions of Richard and predecessors like Henry III, the ideal of the divine right of kings became central to the English monarchy. However, Richard’s lavish cultivation of the divinity of kingship was not enough to create stability for his rule without being backed up with strong structures of governance. Jones implies that his belief in his godly right may have damaged his ability to rule, by adding to the alienation between him and his magnates.
The events of Richard’s reign also show the extent of The Changing Structures of Governance from the start of the book. Henry Bolingbroke summoned an assembly without Richard, which ratified the change in kingship. This implied parliaments had their governing powers: the political community could change the king. Amongst their reasoning, they described the Appellants as a group who “wished the king to be under good rule” (586), showing that the idea that the magnates should govern the king to some degree was embedded.
Jones also highlights the English Cultural Development that took place, suggesting that the notion of England as a unified entity developed through the Plantagenet period. He notes the rise of English as a cultural and governmental language. Artistic and historical literature in English flourished; Edward’s reforms shifted parliamentary proceedings into English. This related to the broadening of the political community: by this point, the Commons was a formal part of parliament, offering political participation to wealthy parts of society outside of the magnates and bishops. They had significant power and expectations, co-opting John of Gaunt to represent their demands. An even broader political engagement can be seen in The Peasants’ Revolt, the first popular uprising, though it was ultimately stifled.
Jones uses the Conclusion to give an overview of these cultural and structural changes of the entire period. He shows how the personal nature of much of his narrative history is in tandem with huge historical events and shifts.
British Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Medieval Literature / Middle Ages
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection