43 pages • 1 hour read
Deborah BlumA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
By 1927, Charles Norris had grown increasingly concerned by how Prohibition was affecting New York City’s residents. The law had seemingly had the opposite effect of its intention, with New Yorkers drinking “more recklessly [and] more adventurously” than they had prior to Prohibition (152). With no legal way to procure alcohol, New York’s drinkers went to illegal saloons that used chemical solutions, such as Formula 39b, to remove the toxic methyl alcohol from industrial alcohol. These attempts were never fully successful, however, which meant that drinkers were often consuming drinks laced with toxic methyl alcohol. In response, the US government began ordering corporations to pour even more toxic poisons into their industrial alcohol, with the hopes of deterring illegal drinking.
The medical examiner office saw an increase in the number of deaths caused by poisoned alcohol, and Norris was outraged that the government was knowingly poisoning drinkers. In a public statement, Norris declared that “the United States Government must be charged with the moral responsibility for the deaths that poisoned liquor causes […]” (155). In response, Prohibition advocates claimed that individuals choosing to break the law bore the sole responsibility for their deaths. Norris, however, continued to publicly argue against Prohibition, conducting studies that revealed the extent to which liquor in New York was poisoned. Norris also published an essay, titled “Our Experiment in Extermination,” that argued that Prohibition’s victims were primarily the poor, who could not afford the cleaner liquor procured by New York’s wealthier residents.
Blum closes the chapter by discussing the murder of Albert Snyder, which was solved based on chemical analysis from Gettler’s toxicology lab. Snyder was murdered by his wife, Ruth Snyder, and her lover, Judd Gray. Ruth and Gray had sought to murder Albert after taking out a life insurance claim that promised to pay double “if his death was due to misadventure” (165). The two murdered Snyder by twisting wire around his neck, and afterward Ruth claimed to the police that burglars had broken in and killed Albert. However, after the police pressed Ruth on holes in her story, Ruth confessed and attempted to pin the murder on Gray. After the police caught Gray, he claimed that Ruth was the killer and that he had only hit Snyder in self-defense after Snyder attacked him. In the ensuing trial, Gettler testified that an analysis of Snyder’s brain had shown he was “woozy with drink” (169), meaning that he’d been too drunk to attack Gray. Gettler’s analysis helped to convince the jury of Ruth and Gray’s guilt, and the two were “sentenced to die in the electric chair” (169).
In the late 19th century, scientists studying the Earth’s rocks discovered that “Some sizzled with energy and even emitted radiation” (178). As Pierre and Marie Curie ran laboratory tests to discover why the rocks were behaving this way, they discovered the elements polonium and radium, which both had the property of “emit[ing] particles.” Radium immediately became a medical sensation, with doctors believing that exposure to radium could aid in curing diseases. As doctors claimed radium’s effects to be “miraculous,” companies began churning out a bevy of wellness products that contained radium, including “radium water […] radium soda, [and] radium candy” (179). German scientists also discovered the ability to use radium for industrial purposes, deriving a “self-luminous paint” that could be used to make surfaces glow in the dark (180).
Despite radium’s purported healing properties, New Jersey’s medical examiner, Harrison Stanford Martland, began investigating the element in the 1920s, believing it to be more harmful than previously realized. Martland’s interest in the element was piqued by a number of deaths occurring at the United States Radium Corporation’s factory in Orange, New Jersey. At the factory, “teenage girls and young women” painted radium paint onto watches (181). The workers would “shape their brushes with their lips” (180), ingesting bits of radium each time. After some of the girls fell ill and died, their bones disintegrating over a number of years, Martland investigated how radium affected the human body. Martland discovered that radium releases three different kinds of radiation: alpha, beta, and gamma. Though alpha radiation is typically harmless when airborne, inside of the human body it causes severe damage to bodily tissues. Due to radium’s similarity to the element calcium, the majority of radium “is deposited into the bones” (185). Once there, it slowly erodes the bones until they completely disintegrate.
Martland’s report spurred a number of the US Radium Corporation’s former employees, who were all suffering from signs of radiation poisoning, to sue the company. In 1928, Martland contacted Charles Norris for assistance in analyzing the bones of a dead employee to determine whether radiation had killed her. Norris assigned Gettler to analyze the bones, and Gettler devises a test “for radioactivity.” The test involved wrapping the bones in X-ray film, which would show spots if the bones were radioactive. At the end of the test, the film “showed a dazzle of pale spots” (188), indicating that the employee had absorbed a heavy amount of radiation. The Radium Corporation’s attorneys argued that the employees had exceeded the “statute of limitations” by not suing when they first ingested the radium (188). In response, the employees’ attorneys used Gettler’s research to argue that radium’s deadly effects were only evident years after initial exposure, prompting the Radium Corporation to settle outside of court.
Though the Prohibition years saw many New Yorkers die from drinking toxic methyl alcohol, Gettler was also tallying cases in which drinkers had “been killed instead by so-called good liquor” (197), otherwise known as ethyl alcohol. Ethyl and methyl alcohol have similar chemical structures, composed of “the three most important atoms on Earth […] carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen” (198). In spite of their similarities, the different arrangements of the same atoms yields both deadly poison (methyl alcohol) and a mostly harmless drink (ethyl alcohol). However, ethyl alcohol can still wreak havoc on the human body when consumed in excessive amounts, harming the brain structure and sometimes leading to death. Gettler decided to systematically examine how alcohol behaves in the human body.
Gettler studied thousands of corpses from New York’s morgue with the aim of comparing individuals who had died from drinking with those who had died of natural causes. One of Gettler’s first topics of investigation was how much alcohol the brain needs to absorb for a person to become intoxicated. Gettler devised a test that involved “minc[ing] chunks of brain” and then using “alcohol analysis devices” to determine what level of alcohol was present (208). By comparing the brains of those who had died of natural causes with those who died of drinking, Gettler devised a scale that reported how alcohol affects the human body. The scale was divided into four levels indicated by + signs, with one + referring to an alcoholic content of “below 0.1 percent” and four +’s indicating an individual with “0.4 to 0.6 percent alcoholic content” (210). Individuals in the highest ranking “had consumed so much liquor that they succumbed to ethyl alcohol poisoning” and typically had died from it (210).
Gettler also created a study to examine whether drinkers could develop an immunity to alcohol’s effects by repeated consumption of liquor. Gettler fed 12 dogs ethyl alcohol until the dogs had been “habituated to alcohol” (213). He then noted how these dogs responded to alcohol in comparison to dogs who had never consumed liquor. The dogs who had never consumed alcohol before tended to show a greater reaction to alcohol, and analysis of their bodies revealed that they had absorbed a higher amount of “alcohol content.” While such results suggested that the “habituated dogs” had built up a slight tolerance to alcohol, Gettler also noted that these dogs showed signs of drunkenness after ingesting an amount of more than 0.25 percent alcoholic content. Gettler concluded that no such “magical immunity” was possible and that even long-time drinkers were susceptible to alcohol’s bodily effects.
Though Gettler’s toxicological research was helping New York’s police in solving numerous investigations, Norris felt that his medical examiner office continued to be undervalued by the New York government. Throughout his time running the office, he continually fought with the mayor over receiving enough funding. When Joseph McKee was appointed acting mayor in 1932, he immediately targeted New York’s budget, “order[ing] every department in the city, without exception, to cut its budget by 20 percent” (220). Norris resigned from his post, believing that the mayor had slashed the budget so severely that the medical examiner’s office could no longer properly do its job. However, Norris quickly grew bored of retirement and agreed to return as chief medical examiner in exchange for an increased budget.
Throughout these chapters, a central focus is on changing attitudes towards Prohibition. While Prohibition became popular amongst Americans in the early 1920s due to its promise to eradicate excessive drinking, by the end of the decade many saw Prohibition as a failure: “many now drank more than ever, more recklessly, more adventurously” (152). Alongside this questioning of the efficacy of Prohibition, Blum explores a growing debate over the ethics of the law, at the center of which was Charles Norris.
Norris had long suspected that Prohibition would fail in its attempt to halt drinking, holding a press conference prior to the law’s enactment to warn that it would only push individuals to pursue toxic substitutes for legal liquor. Norris’s position as chief medical examiner provided him with a unique insight into how Prohibition was affecting New York’s population. As Norris noticed a rise in deaths stemming from drinking illegal alcohol, he became particularly concerned over the US government’s policy of poisoning industrial alcohol in the hopes of deterring drinkers. In Norris’s view, such practices amounted to the United States murdering its own citizens: “the United States Government must be charged with the moral responsibility for the deaths that poisoned liquor causes […]” (155). Norris’s outrage was echoed by many in the national press, which described the government’s actions as outright “barbarous.”
Such charges were passionately opposed by temperance advocates, such as Wayne Wheeler, a representative of the influential Anti-Saloon League of America. Countering Norris’s argument, Wheeler argued that drinkers committing illegal acts held sole responsibility for whatever consequences befell them: “[a drinker is] in the same category as the man who walks into a drug store, buys a bottle of carbolic acid with a label on it marked ‘poisonous,’ and drinks the contents” (155). In Norris’s view, such arguments amounted to a misrepresentation of the dangers of drinking. Many drinkers failed to realize how toxic the moonshine they were drinking was, as methyl alcohol’s poisonous effects often took hours to set in. Such drinkers may have been unaware that they were ingesting poisons that might kill them.
Further, Norris’s office even began to see an increase in the numbers of New Yorkers poisoned by drinking the typically safe ethyl alcohol, the main ingredient of legal liquors. Norris’s many reports about Prohibition’s effects ultimately helped to alter national beliefs about the efficacy of Prohibition. By the early 1930s, “many Americans believed that the alcohol restrictions had contributed to the economy’s collapse” (222), and Franklin Delano Roosevelt swept the election on an anti-Prohibition political platform.