42 pages • 1 hour read
John RuskinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Gothic is the next style in Western architectural history after Byzantine. Ruskin argues that it is difficult to define the Gothic style because it consists of many different elements, not all of which are present in every piece of “Gothic” architecture. Nevertheless, all Gothic buildings share an essential spirit that can be traced to both “external forms” and “internal elements,” or “mental tendencies.”
The latter include “fancifulness, love of variety, love of richness” (159) and the grotesque, while the former include pointed arches, vaulted roofs, and decoration that imitates leaf forms. For Ruskin, the Gothic style glories in an honest realism and “extreme love of truth” (171) which is related to a Christian concern for portraying life and human nature to the full, in terms of both strength and weakness. As such, Gothic art presents a “humility” which is lacking in the idealized perfectionism of classical art.
The Gothic style was developed by northern European peoples—it is named after the Goths, a Germanic tribe—and is believed to express something of their character and ideals as well as the climate and landscape in which they lived. Ruskin conducts a detailed analysis of the elements of Gothic and offers a guide for how to “read” a Gothic building.
Ruskin emphasizes that it is the buildings from the Gothic and Renaissance periods which make Venice what it is today for most visitors, rather than the buildings of the Byzantine period. The main Gothic building in Venice is the Ducal Palace, located facing St. Mark’s Basilica. The seat of Venice’s government and the meeting place for its Grand Council, the palace was built principally from 1320-1350. Construction began in the Byzantine style, continued in the Gothic, and underwent later Renaissance additions, although the Gothic style is predominant. The palace occupied the best of Venice’s artisans for a generation and is one of the city’s most ambitious and remarkable buildings—“the great work of Venice” according to Ruskin (299).
Ruskin outlines the ground plan of the palace and recounts the history of its construction. This can be traced all the way back to Venice’s beginnings in 813, when the doge planned a major government building on the spot of the present palace. The main work took place in the 14th century, during the golden age of Gothic, and considerable rebuilding took place during the next two centuries due to a series of fires that destroyed parts of the building. In turn, the later additions to the palace give evidence of the “decline” of artistic styles and ethos in Venice during the Renaissance and afterward. Thus, the Ducal Palace is a building that documents the entire story of Venice’s rise and fall.
These chapters could be considered the major section of The Stones of Venice, as it outlines Ruskin’s views on the Gothic style. These considerations will ultimately lead to his argument for the revival of this style in England, stated most forcefully in the Conclusion. Ruskin’s description of the Gothic style in Chapter 4 was particularly influential on the participants in the Gothic Revival movement (See: Background). Ruskin defines Gothic in terms of various aesthetic and moral qualities, showing again his conviction that architecture expresses or reveals the temperament, thought, personality, and interests of the designer or builder, embodying the links between Art and Society’s Moral Health.
Building on this principle, Ruskin extends his analysis of Gothic architecture to a consideration of ethnic character. Ruskin draws a contrast between the “northern” and “southern” European temperaments, with Gothic seen as a typical product of the northern European personality since it developed principally in northern France and England. While Ruskin’s regional characterizations could be considered stereotypical and limiting today, they were used by many thinkers in the 19th century as a basis for analyzing European art and culture.
According to Ruskin, northern builders’ experience of a cold climate and a rough, wild environment caused them to work quickly and gave a “sharp energy” to their work. This temperament also gave northerners “strength of will, independence of character, resoluteness of purpose, impatience of undue control” and a “general tendency to set the individual reason against authority, and the individual deed against destiny” (175). Ruskin contrasts these qualities with the “languid submission […] to tradition, and purpose to fatality” (175) which he sees as characteristic of the southern peoples of Europe and which is manifest in their architecture—particularly its consistent reference to classical Greco-Roman style.
Thus, Ruskin’s advocacy of the Gothic style rests in part on a conception of a supposed “northern” ethnic identity. This is a cultural identity which includes the characteristics of the English people, especially as associated with the qualities of independence and individualism associated with Protestant culture. Moreover, Ruskin’s argument that the Gothic style embodies qualities of the “savage” and unpredictable relates to the values of the Romantic movement and reflect his motives in Revising the Standard Narrative of Art History, as Romanticism appreciated those qualities in art as opposed to the regularity and symmetry valued in classical art. Ruskin’s architectural program thus includes an implied element of ethnic pride as well as embodying the ideals of 19th-century Romanticism.