Thinking, Fast and Slow

In the Introduction and Conclusions, as well as occasionally in between, Kahneman analogizes his work to that of physicians. Briefly explain the analogy and provide at least one reason why you think Kahneman believed it important to make this point in such prominent places in the book. Then, evaluate whether the analogy is valid and what it may add or detract from the public’s understanding of the value of the work performed by Kahneman and others in his field.

When Kahneman uses phrases like “intuitive judgments” or “intuitive decisions,” what is he referring to? How does that meaning correspond with, or differ from, your preexisting sense of what “intuition” means? How, if at all, did Kahneman’s discussion of these concepts affect your understand of human intuition?

Do you think that the concepts of System 1 and System 2 are a helpful way to think about the human mind as it makes decisions? Is treating System 1 and System 2 as characters a helpful way to convey the concepts that Kahneman wishes to express? To the extent that naming aspects of the mind as characters in a story may be helpful to understanding, does Kahneman use the device effectively in this book?

What characteristics or tendencies of the mind discussed in the book most conflicted with your understanding of how the mind works before encountering the book? Are you convinced by Kahneman’s discussion on these points, or do you continue to disagree?

Identify at least three characteristics or tendencies of the mind, as discussed by Kahneman in Parts 1, 2, and 3, that you believe conflict with portrayals of how the mind works in popular culture (such as in movies, television shows, or song lyrics). Explain how Kahneman demonstrates, or fails to demonstrate, that the pop culture portrayal is erroneous.

Name two facets of well-being that you believe are inadequately considered in policymaking and explain how a better understanding of these aspects, by policymakers or the public, would help address specific social problems currently facing society.

Consider three professional fields or specialties where one might argue that there are experts (other than those featured to discuss expert intuition in the book). Discuss whether these fields meet Kahneman’s criteria (such as regular environment and accurate feedback) for the development of expertise sufficient to cultivate reliable intuitive judgment. Do you think the criteria identified by Kahneman are the appropriate considerations? Do you think that something should be done to protect consumers from false claims in fields where such expertise is not possible? Why or why not?

What does Kahneman mean by a “cognitive illusion”? Explain how this applies to at least two examples drawn from the book.